NNNicolet Law Office, S.C.

U.S. Supreme Court weighs Wisconsin gerrymandering case

Earlier this month, the nation’s highest court heard oral arguments in a case that could have far-reaching implications for American elections. Focused on electoral gerrymandering in Wisconsin, the case forces the Supreme Court justices to consider their own role in legislative redistricting.

What is gerrymandering?

Each decade, lawmakers re-draw legislative districts to account for the most current census data. This ensures that each district contains roughly the same number of voters. However, the political party in power typically has control of where the borders are drawn – giving them significant leeway to strategically divide voters by neighborhood, race, income or, as alleged in this case, political party.

Gerrymandering is the process of manipulating the boundaries of legislative districts to benefit one political party, typically the party in power. It is a uniquely American practice, and one that’s nearly as old as our democracy itself. But some believe it unfairly allows the controlling party to consolidate its base and unconstitutionally influence election results in the future.

Should courts intervene?

While politicians in both parties have faced allegations of unconstitutional manipulation of electoral maps, the case before the Supreme Court revolves around Republican redistricting in Wisconsin. For the present, Republicans seem to have a strong hold on Wisconsin’s legislature. Is this because legislative redistricting has rigged the game, or because the Republican Party reflects the views of the majority of voters?

Last November, a federal court ruled that Wisconsin’s electoral map violated the Constitution – specifically the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause and the First Amendment freedoms of speech and association.

Now the Supreme Court must decide whether courts should have a say in such matters. While the Court has invalidated electoral maps that were discriminatory based on race, they have never ruled on maps that give one political party an advantage.

High stakes on both sides

Like most cases that make it to the country’s highest court, this one is steeped in controversy. Attorneys and experts on both sides have spoken about the risks if the Court doesn’t go their way.

Republicans and other supporters of the state’s redistricting warn that overturning the map would “launch a redistricting revolution.” They argue that courts would be in the tenuous position of having to referee partisan squabbles over legislative districts all over the country.

On the other side, those who believe the Wisconsin map to be unconstitutional warn that to do nothing would encourage other states to follow suit, further disenfranchising voters and compromising the integrity of elections nationwide.

Will SCOTUS decide along party lines?

According to Wisconsin Public Radio, the justices appeared sharply divided in oral arguments – primarily between those appointed by Democratic presidents and those appointed by Republicans. However, it may not be an easy 5-4 victory for conservatives; Justice Anthony Kennedy sometimes takes the side of the more liberal justices.

What makes Justice Kennedy’s dilemma particularly interesting is his opinion in a similar case from 2004. In that case, he left room for the Court to develop a “workable standard” for assessing partisan gerrymandering. All eyes will be on Justice Kennedy while the Court decides this landmark case. No matter how the Court decides, it will likely influence electoral maps – and perhaps election results – all over the United States.

Awards & Recognition

Our peers and independent third-party organizations have recognized the hard work and dedication we put into every case. This has led to numerous awards and accolades.

  1. Rated By Super Lawyers | Russel D. Nicolet
    Super Lawyers Rising Stars
    Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Personal Injury Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb | Top Attorney Bankruptcy
  2. The American Association of Legal Advocates Wisconsin Association for Justice BBB Accredited Business - A+
  3. Minnesota State Bar Association American Bar Association State Bar of Wisconsin
  4. BV Distinguished | Lexis Nexis | Martindale-Hubbell | For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability The National Trial Lawyers

Office Locations

Regional Office Map

Hudson Office
511 2nd Street Suite 203
Hudson, WI 54016

Phone: 715-802-0872
Hudson Law Office Map

Woodbury Office
724 Bielenberg Drive, Suite 126
Woodbury, MN 55125

Phone: 651-243-2872
Woodbury Law Office Map

Amery Office
228 Keller Ave N., Suite 3A
Amery, WI 54001

Phone: 715-802-0872
Amery Law Office Map

Superior Office
1720 North Twelfth Street
Superior, WI 54880

Phone: 715-802-0872
Superior Law Office Map

New Richmond Office
1500 Madison Ave., Suite 220
New Richmond, WI 54017

Phone: 715-802-0872
New Richmond Law Office Map

Wausau Office
408 Third Street
Wausau, WI 54401

Map & Directions

Rice Lake Office
337 N. Main Street
Rice Lake, WI 54868

Phone: 715-802-0872
Rice Lake Law Office Map

Eau Claire Office
402 Graham Ave, Suite 305
Eau Claire, WI 54701

Phone: 715-802-0872
Eau Claire Law Office Map

Nicolet Law Office, S.C. helps people throughout Wisconsin and Minnesota including; Hudson, Eau Claire, Superior, Wausau, Amery, Rice Lake, Chippewa Falls, River Falls, Menomonie, Hayward, New Richmond, Spooner, Bloomer and Barron.

Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters.

We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.